EU Inc legislative tracker

  1. Proposal
  2. Parliament & Council
  3. Trilogue & agreement
  4. Adoption
  5. Application

Next — JURI considers amendments from 7 September; committee vote on the negotiating mandate expected during the month.

Current stage: Ordinary legislative procedure, first reading — Council working-party negotiations (Irish Presidency) and Parliament (JURI) amendment phase running in parallel.

The single, continuously updated record of where the EU Inc regulation stands — from the Draghi and Letta reports to the targeted adoption and first registrations. Dates are shown; the full change history is the git log of this site.

Timeline

  1. Letta report: 'Much More Than a Market'

    Frames the fragmentation of 27 national company-law regimes as a barrier to scaling across the single market.

    Primary source
  2. Draghi report on EU competitiveness

    Describes legal fragmentation as an 'invisible tariff' on cross-border growth; cited as a driver for a 28th regime.

    Primary source
  3. Commission stakeholder consultation closes

    Public consultation on a 28th company-law regime feeds the Commission's impact assessment.

    Primary source
  4. Parliament resolution calls for the framework (2025/2079(INL))

    Own-initiative resolution recommends an optional EU-wide legal form for innovative companies, ahead of the Commission proposal.

    Primary source
  5. 'One Europe, One Market' roadmap

    President von der Leyen frames EU Inc as single-market infrastructure within the roadmap.

    Primary source
  6. Commission publishes the EU Inc proposal, COM(2026) 321

    Optional EU-wide legal form (Regulation, Art. 114 TFEU): <48h digital registration, <€100, no minimum capital, single registration certificate, BRIS-based central interface, once-only principle, harmonised EU-ESO stock options, digital wind-down.

    Primary source
  7. European Council endorses adoption by end-2026

    The European Council endorses 'One Europe, One Market', names the 28th regime a 2026 priority and calls on co-legislators to adopt it by year end.

    Primary source
  8. René Repasi appointed Parliament rapporteur (JURI)

    René Repasi (S&D, Germany) leads the file in the JURI committee; shadow rapporteurs include Pascal Canfin (Renew) and Arash Saeidi (GUE/NGL).

    Primary source
  9. JURI committee examines the proposal

    Justice Commissioner Michael McGrath presents the text to the Legal Affairs committee.

    Primary source
  10. Competitiveness Council: first policy debate

    Most delegations back the end-2026 target. Open issues flagged: anti-fraud/AML safeguards, legal certainty, national labour rules, worker participation and co-determination.

    Primary source
  11. JURI rapporteur's draft report (PE790.143)

    Repasi's draft report (PE790.143v01-00, 151 pages, 246 amendments) opens the Parliament's amendment phase.

    Primary source
  12. Irish Council Presidency takes over

    Ireland chairs Council negotiations to December and names the 28th regime in its programme. Working-party sessions continue (Session 10 on 2 Jul; 11–12 on 8 & 23 Jul).

    Primary source
  13. EESC adopts its opinion, 197–0

    Consultative opinion (INT/1123, rapporteur Leuchters): supports the digital-by-design registration and harmonised share classes; questions the fast-track liquidation and demands explicit safeguards on workers' participation rights.

    Primary source
  14. Parliament amendment deadline (JURI)

    Deadline for JURI members and shadow rapporteurs to table amendments passed; ECON and EMPL opinion deadline the same day. JURI considers amendments from 7 September.

    Primary source
  15. JURI committee vote on the negotiating mandate

    JURI considers amendments (from 7 Sep) and is expected to vote its negotiating mandate in September (to be confirmed), before a plenary vote and trilogues.

    Primary source
  16. Targeted political agreement (trilogue)

    Co-legislators aim for agreement by end-2026. Date not confirmed; depends on the trilogue outcome.

    Primary source
  17. Regulation expected to apply; first registrations

    Application typically ~12 months after entry into force, plus infrastructure build-out. Law firms judge real EU Inc incorporations unlikely before 2028, despite the optimistic 'operational early 2027' framing.

    Primary source

Member-state positions on opt-in

CountryPositionNote
FranceLeaning inStartup ecosystem strongly supportive (France Digitale; eu-inc.org backers). No binding government position yet. Domestic benchmark: the SAS.
EstoniaLeaning inDigital-first administration (e-Residency, digital registries) aligns with the single-window / BRIS model. Likely early adopter.
GermanyDebatingDebate centres on interaction with the GmbH and with co-determination (Mitbestimmung); worker-participation safeguards are a live issue.
IrelandDebatingHolds the Council Presidency (H2 2026) and steers the file. Chairing role is procedural, not a substantive national position.
SwedenLeaning inGovernment fact memorandum (2025/26:FPM89) judges the proposal proportionate and simplification-oriented, flagging the insolvency provisions; Riksdag cleared subsidiarity 197–149.
FinlandLeaning inCouncil written comments: 'we support the objectives of the proposal', with investor-protection and anti-abuse caveats (WK 9143/2026); national parliamentary scrutiny ongoing.
DenmarkLeaning inConstructive Council comments: welcomes the wallet-by-default principle, seeks clarity on employee representation and signatory rights (WK 9143/2026).
AustriaDebatingLoud domestic debate: ecosystem open letter urges support while the Chamber of Labour objects on co-determination grounds. No government position published.
All member statesUndeclaredCouncil decides by qualified majority — no single-state veto. Live fault lines across delegations: anti-abuse safeguards and worker participation (COMPET, 28 May 2026).